🥢 Have You Eaten Yet?

A cultural study on food, love, and intergenerational care in Chinese immigrant families

📝 Context

For this university studio, we explored how food functions as a love language in Chinese immigrant families, revealing how emotional care, cultural identity, and resilience are passed down through shared meals and silent gestures.

🤝 Role

User Researcher & Project Manager

⌛️ Timeline

6 weeks (April–May 2024)

👯‍♀️ Team

Vivian Truong + 2 Team Members

🏆 Achievements

Highest Mark in Final Assignment

🔄 Our Process at a Glance

We designed a research process that would let us explore both the depth of individual stories and the breadth of community perspectives. Each step built upon the last, helping us move from initial assumptions to rich, layered insights.

A visual overview of the UX research process, including steps like literature review, interviews, community engagement, and thematic analysis.
A visual overview of the UX research process, including steps like literature review, interviews, community engagement, and thematic analysis.
A visual overview of the UX research process, including steps like literature review, interviews, community engagement, and thematic analysis.

A research journey from literature to lived experiences.

🧭 Setting the Foundation

We began with desktop research into cross-cultural family dynamics, emotional expression, and non-verbal care in Chinese culture. Before asking others about their experiences, we wanted to understand the systems, histories, and traditions that shape how care is communicated across generations.

Our initial literature review included:

📚

Studies on filial piety and emotional suppression in Chinese households

Rooted in Confucianism, filial piety (孝) emphasises duty and care for parents. In Chinese immigrant families, this often shows up in how parents guide children to preserve tradition at home.

Chiang & Yang, 2008

🧠

Cultural psychology texts on immigrant identity

While traditional roles shift after migration, emotional care and respect from children remain deeply valued in older Chinese immigrant communities.

Zhang, 2020

🍜

Articles on food as communication and memory

Preparing and sharing food is a key way immigrant families express love, often replacing verbal affection with acts of service.

Verywell Mind, 2022

🤫

Non-verbal care across generations

Asian families tend to communicate affection through quiet acts (like cooking or caretaking) rather than direct praise, reinforcing harmony and emotional closeness.

Verywell Mind, 2022

From this, we discovered that in many Chinese-Australian families, meals often become the “stage” for emotional expression especially in place of verbal affection. This shaped our hypothesis:

Food rituals may be emotionally expressive, but often misunderstood across generations.

We needed methods that could uncover both surface-level habits and deeper emotional meaning. Therefore, we built our research plan to explore both the breadth of community expression and the depth of personal experience.

A collage of three digital research boards showing early project framing for a study on food as a love language in Asian families. The boards include thematic quotes, article references, sticky notes on historical famine, and proposed research aims and questions.

Early research boards exploring food, care, and cultural dynamics in immigrant families.

Starting with a strong foundation helped us ask sharper questions in the field. It reminded me that meaningful research starts long before the first interview. It starts with listening, even to what's already been written.

🎤 Semi-Structured Interviews

We interviewed 9 participants aged 10–60 across two generations. This method allowed us to stay consistent while holding space for emotional storytelling.

Why this method?

Food is intimate. Talking about it often reveals more than people intend: memories, grief, pride. A rigid structure would’ve limited this. So we used flexible guides based on reciprocal determinism, allowing stories to flow while capturing behavioural, personal, and cultural cues.

She never said ‘I love you,’ but when I was sick, she’d just bring me soup. That’s her way.

-Interview Participant

My dad used to scold me at the dinner table, but he’d always serve me first.

-Interview Participant

Screenshot of two separate virtual interview sessions. Vivian appears in both, conducting interviews with different participants via video call.

Conducting remote interviews to capture stories across generations and experiences.

I learned that silence isn’t a gap; it’s part of the data. Especially in immigrant families, what’s not said matters just as much as what is.

🏮 Pop-Up Engagement: Flavours of the Past

🏮 Pop-Up Engagement: Flavours of the Past

A large public installation board titled “Have U Eaten Yet?” displayed in a city plaza. The board is covered with handwritten sticky notes in English and Chinese, alongside food images and prompt questions like “What’s your favourite Chinese dish to share with family?” and “What does this phrase mean to you?” A sign on the right invites passersby to “Take a sticky note & write how you’re feeling :)”.

Public memory wall inviting reflections on food, love, and cultural connection.

To include more community voices, we designed and ran a participatory installation in Chatswood, a suburb chosen for their Chinese-Australian cultural density.

We set up a public memory wall, with prompts like:

🏡

What dish reminds you of home?

🧡

How do you show love through food?

🧑‍🧑‍🧒‍🧒

What’s something you wish your family understood?

40+ strangers contributed sticky notes, drawings, and reflections in English, Chinese, or both.

Why this method?

Not everyone joins formal interviews. This public storytelling approach allowed for emotional spontaneity, low-barrier access, and rich observational insight (e.g. who lingered, who returned, who brought family back later).

My grandma never hugged me. But she made the best steamed fish. That was her hug.

-Participant response on sticky note

A group of people gathers around a public installation board titled “Have U Eaten Yet?” in an outdoor shopping area. The board is filled with sticky notes and food-related prompts. Some participants are reading or writing responses, while others observe or take photos.

Passersby engage with the installation as they read, reflect, and contribute their stories.

Designing for participation, not just data collection, changed how I see research. People are not subjects; they're collaborators when given the right tools and space.

🔁 Follow-Up Interviews

We reconnected with 17 participants who left meaningful notes at the installation. These 1:1 conversations helped uncover the emotional depth behind their brief responses.

We asked:

  • “What made you choose that dish?”

  • “What memories does it hold?”

  • “Do you see food as something you give or something you receive?”

These sessions helped us discover new layers; what began as a drawing or one-liner often revealed deeper emotional histories.

“I drew that soup because that’s the only time we sat at the same table without arguing."

-Follow up Interview Participant

A young girl reaches up to place a sticky note on the “Have U Eaten Yet?” installation board, while two others stand nearby watching. The board is filled with handwritten notes and food-related prompts.
A young girl reaches up to place a sticky note on the “Have U Eaten Yet?” installation board, while two others stand nearby watching. The board is filled with handwritten notes and food-related prompts.

Adding a memory to the wall.

Three people stand in front of the “Have U Eaten Yet?” installation in a public space. They are reading sticky notes left by previous contributors, with the stairs of a concert hall in the background.
Three people stand in front of the “Have U Eaten Yet?” installation in a public space. They are reading sticky notes left by previous contributors, with the stairs of a concert hall in the background.

Reading stories left by others.

Why this method?

We wanted to triangulate insights from interviews, public notes, and follow-ups, capturing both intention and emotion. It helped validate themes and challenged our assumptions.

Following up helped me realise that research is iterative. You rarely get the full story the first time - it takes care, trust, and time.

🧵 Thematic Analysis

After collecting 50+ narrative fragments across interviews and community engagement, we chose to use inductive thematic analysis to synthesise the data. This approach aligned with our research aims:

Uncover food-related generational trauma in Chinese immigrant families, and how love is expressed across generations through food.

Why thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis helped us identify emotional patterns without forcing predefined assumptions, which was critical for a topic as intimate and layered as intergenerational care and trauma. Our stories spanned languages, generations, and contexts, and we needed a method that could hold space for complexity.

We followed a collaborative process:

Step 1: Initial Coding

Each team member coded interviews individually, highlighting meaningful phrases like "She cuts fruit for me every day" or "I want to be a different parent than mine were."
These became our first codes.

Screenshot of four digital sticky note boards showing initial interview coding. Quotes from participants are grouped under emerging themes such as “Quality Family Time During Dinner,” “Family Bonding Through Shared Meals,” “Dinner Time as the Only Bonding Time in the Day,” and “Family Bonding Over Silence and Dinner.” Notes are colour-coded by speaker.

Early coding breakdown from interview transcripts, revealing emotional themes around food and family.

Step 2: Sub-themes

We then grouped codes by emotional proximity, clustering them under early sub-themes like “food as control,” “silent affection,” and “cultural guilt.”

Screenshot of grouped interview quotes arranged into thematic clusters. Sticky notes are organised under five headings: “Varied Food Practices in Chinese Families,” “Food as a Means of Preserving Cultural Heritage,” “Nurturing Family Traditions Through Food,” and “Cultural Food Traditions and Customs.” Quotes are colour-coded by participant.

Clustering codes into sub-themes to explore deeper emotional and cultural connections to food.

Step 3: Defining themes

Finally, we refined and reframed sub-themes into broader, research-aligned themes like:

🍜

Meals as Emotional Anchors

Eating together (whether in silence or celebration) was deeply tied to feelings of being cared for. One participant said: “She didn’t say much, but she always made my favourite soup when I looked tired.”

🎭

Food as Cultural Identity

Recipes were described as “heirlooms,” passed down across generations. They carried both history and hope. “When I cook what my parents taught me, I feel like I’m speaking their language.”

💛

Tensions of Love & Expectation

Not all associations were positive. Some participants described food as an obligation or pressure point tied to body image or control.

Digital whiteboard view showing three stages of thematic analysis. On the left are clusters of individual colour-coded sticky notes labelled "Step One – Codes." In the centre, grouped notes under categories like “Self-Identity,” “Cultural,” and “Expression” represent "Step Two – Sub-Themes." On the right, broader themes like “Importance of Family Meals” and “Generational Differences” are shown under "Step Three – Themes."

From codes to sub-themes to final themes, we were mapping meaning through every layer.

Thematic analysis reminded me that not every quote fits neatly into a theme... and that’s okay. It taught me how to let meaning emerge organically, and to prioritise empathy over rigidity in the way we interpret human experience.

👩‍🔬 My Role

As one of the core researchers on this project, I contributed to both planning and executing our research, particularly around synthesis, community engagement, and narrative framing. My contributions included:

  • Assisted in conducting interviews and participated in several follow-ups

  • Led thematic coding and supported collaborative affinity mapping

  • Contributed to literature review and desktop research to shape our problem framing

  • Designed the tone and structure of our pop-up engagement

  • Managed synthesis documentation and storytelling outputs for final deliverables

🔍 Dig into the details

I’ve attached more details about the project (only sharing what I’m allowed to showcase).

💡 Reflections

This project taught me how to sit with ambiguity, code for emotion, and translate quiet stories into powerful insights. I learned that researching with empathy isn’t just about asking thoughtful questions; it’s about how you listen, what you notice, and what you choose to honour in the telling. We weren’t just collecting stories. We were holding space for people to feel seen.

“Food speaks in ways our parents sometimes can’t.”

Working across generations, languages, and cultures taught me that meaning is often subtle, and that silence, hesitation, and ritual can say just as much as spoken words. It shaped the way I now approach research: as an act of care, not just discovery.

Vivian sitting on outdoor steps using markers to write signage for the “Have U Eaten Yet?” installation. Craft materials are scattered nearby.

Prepping the setup

Three team members smiling and posing for a selfie in front of the installation site.

Team selfie!

Two team members setting up the “Have U Eaten Yet?” board, placing prompts and sticky notes on the display.

Setting up the wall

📑 References

Chiang, H., & Yang, J. (2008). Filial piety and emotional expression in Chinese families.
Zhang, W. (2020). Cultural psychology and immigrant identity: Shifting roles across generations.
Verywell Mind. (2022). How food can communicate love in immigrant families. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com
Verywell Mind. (2022). Non-verbal ways Asian families express care. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com

Thanks for Visiting.

Keep building.

Thanks for Visiting.

Keep building.

Thanks for Visiting.

Keep building.